The CEO had also promised to host a live Q&A regarding the report, but has since pushed it back to Saturday.Īccording to Taibbi's thread as well, Friday's report was "the first installment in a series," hinting at future examples of how Twitter decided to censor content on its platform. Taibbi's barrage of tweets started nearly three hours after Musk first announced that the information was forthcoming, and took about two hours for him to complete. Taibbi also noted that both Republicans and Democrats "had access to these tools." Musk Promises 'Episode 2' on Saturday The report says that such requests from outside sources, whether celebrities or political organizations, became "routine" as Twitter attempted to combat issues like misinformation on its site. Taibbi's thread also showed screenshots of Biden's campaign team requesting that the company "review" specific tweets in 2020. aONKCROEOd- Matt Taibbi December 3, 2022 ‘Twitter Files’ 3 on Trump Ban is the Latest. But such a finding never appears throughout what one executive describes as a "whirlwind" 24-hour, company-wide mess. 3, Matt Taibbi detailed the internal Twitter correspondence that led to the ban of then-President Donald Trump after Jan. The problem with the "hacked materials" ruling, several sources said, was that this normally required an official/law enforcement finding of a hack. "But such a finding never appears throughout what one executive describes as a 'whirlwind' 24-hour, company-wide mess." Trump, who is again running for president, referenced the Twitter Files, a set of internal Twitter documents made public in December, and recent reporting such as an article from the New. "The problem with the 'hacked materials' ruling, several sources said, was that this normally required an official/law enforcement finding of a hack," Taibbi concluded toward the end of his report. The story was originally dismissed by several Democrats in 2020 as a "Russian disinformation operation," but as Newsweek previously reported, there has been no evidence to prove these claims. The decision was reportedly based on what several of Taibbi's sources called a "general warning from federal law enforcement" about the possibility of the Post article stemming from foreign interference. ![]() Comms official Trenton Kennedy writes, “I'm struggling to understand the policy basis for marking this as unsafe”: /w1wBMlG33U- Matt Taibbi December 3, 2022 ![]() Can see the confusion in the following lengthy exchange, which ends up including Gadde and former Trust and safety chief Yoel Roth.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |